Conforming to Society's Norms

Conforming to Society's Norms
In today?s day and age contemporary society?s are built upon the thought of citizen conformity to a prescribed set of values and norms to. This idea of complies to social standards makes one think as to how these norms of fact society as a whole and an individual. The main driving component which draws people too conformity are the desire to be excepted in certain status groups. People fear that if they do not conformity is norms that they will be breaking the social contract therefore been shunned by society at not being able to achieve their personal goals. Further analysis of these forces for conformity in contemporary society it will be shown that these forces produced negative ethical conduct and hinder the foundation of justice that the political system of Canada is based upon.
Conformity in society is what individual takes upon the beliefs and ways of life is another group or from someone in charge. " Conformity includes a strong component of intolerance of nonconformity, necessarily entails an unwillingness to commit other people to deviate from pads of established belief." Conformity is not necessarily imply that one is in agreement with the set of norms but that the norms are merely abided by for various reasons that will be discussed.

Social class hold significant impact on a person?s behavior as a prescribed one?s conditions in life. Social class, in contemporary society, the first to the amount of education of person has been subject to as well as their occupational position. The class hierarchy of suggest that decisions and actions of members of higher class will have an impact on society and have consequences, whereas a believe exist at the lower classes are at the mercy of the Opera class there is an idea of self-direction that exists which is an idea that emphasizes the ability to adapt, to be open-minded, and hold personal responsibility for actions and it can only be accomplished if one?s life conditions allow for freedom of passion. Modern society emphasizes the importance of extended education in order to achieve monetary goals and attain a role in the professional field that will benefit the economy in the country as a whole. Self-direction, therefore, " requires opportunities and experiences that are much more available to people who are more favorably situated in a higher coal order of society; conformity is a natural consequences in adequate opportunity be self-directed." Those in the lower class therefore attain conformist now use as a result of their limited education ultimately influences prestigious job opportunities. Education is important with respect to an idea of self-direction as it provides a proper analytical tools(that would be difficult to attain with proper schooling needed to tolerate and understand not conformity. One?s profession either hinders or defenses went ability to achieve self-direction for example, a person in a higher class position has opportunity, to their job position, to be self-directed and their work which leads to self-direction and other aspects of life. However, a lower class person is denied this opportunity to be self-directed and their job because their education does not allow them to achieve a high status occupation. ?The lower class then comes to regard it as a matter of necessity to conform to authority, both on and off the job.? The Thiokol class structure therefore forces lower classes to conform to the values of the upper classes to the placing of the utmost importance in education and self-directed job opportunities.

Conformity is also response to group pressure. Weather be the common dress and speech of adolescent cliques, cultural practices of ethnic groups, or notions of solidarity with the political parties, conformity is it ever present reply to being part of the social group. There is a motivating power of normative expectation that exists in every group, click, and subculture. There is a natural, psychological tendency for humans to field hatred or resentment towards others who crossed the boundaries that marked reasonable social expectations, as well, it can be said that humans tend to refrain from partaking in actions that will invoke these feelings and others. The institutionalizing of normative codes allows groups that ability to distinguish " right" from ?wrong? which opens a pathway to public stigmatization of an individual for nonconformist ideas or actions she was at an inherent need to be excepted which creates the fear of being publicly shame. Groups hold a 40 over certain resources, therefore, if one or to risk becoming stigmatized the also run the risk of losing access to these resources. More generally, a fear taking responsibility for action or belief that goes against social mourns even walls and becomes a motivating force to conform. The theory of cognitive disonance explains that one under pressure a person will alter the private convictions that their in-line with their public behavior. This theory explains that public conformity leads to private conformity due to people?s need to maintain a balanced view of the world.Dissonance is created when views are not consistent; what a person is public conformity is inconsistent with their own private police since she was desire to maintain a constant outlook on reality there?s pressure to remove the conflicting views. The result is to alter one?s own person believes in order to conform to the public morality, with fear public scorn being a motivating factor.

Similarity, an alternative force of conformity is the idea of ensuring the greater good of society, in other words, the social contract all humans enter into when they become part of society. Thomas Hobbes, a British philosopher, express the notion that all humans desire to live as well as possible in economic, political, and personal well-being. However, this desire cannot be achieved unless there is some form of a peaceful and cooperative social order. Hogs is connected to the idea that humans were to live in the state of nature, life would be " nasty, brutish, in short." Conformity to rules, therefore, is a result of being a member of society. The individual gives up various personal values and Liberty?s in order to live in society and benefit from the resources that social living has to offer.

These forces for conformity and achievement of socially and goals produced negative ethical conduct that only society but in the political round. Politicians tend to treat conformity is if it were a government department, where motivation emerges in the form of efficient methods, gains, and the losers." Public authorities approach the issue of compliance as an investment problem." The Canadian government has become similar to that of the private sector; emphasizing the cost-benefit analysis. However, societal modems are handed down by parliament in the form of statutes and loss is so cannot be arbitrarily obeyed by its legislators. That is to say that the one?s who create the norms should live by them as well. Therefore, politicians and the duty to conform to the standards they have created regardless of the cost benefits or losses that may endure. Another form of negative political conduct that emerges is that of conflict of interest. This?ll curse when a government official does not to maintain distance between their public and private life. Competing goals and achievement methods emerge resulting in ?cutting corners? and servicing personal interest. This is heightened by media influence and the power of gossip. Each broadcasting network has been desire to ?get ahead? at any cost. This desire has created a new form of reporting which involves treating rumors as news. Rumors are usually in the form of ?dirt? regarding a politicians personal life so as to discredit his or her image. This intern does not allow for a separation between the politicians public and private lives and create a conflict of interest. The competing values of a government officials private and public lies hinders the purpose of democracy. As official combat these conflicting goals their accountability suffers in the principles of democracy (representation of the population and accountability to the people) suffer. For example, in 1987 Gary Hart was running in the American Democratic presidential nominations and rumors were spread that he had been unfaithful to his life. These rumors were treated as factual news by the media and were persistent. Hart?s personal life became a constant focus of attention and distracted him from running a solid presidential election campaign. The media and still couldn?t in Hart a conflict of interest between his private and public life which made him incapable of fulfilling his political duties.

The democratic process is also based upon the notions of appointment based on individual merit, representation of the citizens, and accountability of elected officials. However, desire is to achieve political status greatly impeade these principles. Conflict, as shown in the Merton Shane theory, arise between achieving higher political status to legitimate war illegitimate means. ?Red is tape?, legalities, and formalities in the political system often spur the use of illegitimate means because of the lengthy amount of time it can otherwise take to get programs and policies implemented. At this comes the payment of goals to illegitimate means such as ?gifts and gains? and ?patronage.? These means undermine the political system. The ?gifts and gains? concept is based upon the idea of bribery. The term ?gifts? usually the first to something giving to a government official and it is usually in the absence of identifiable giver.?Gains are perks, that if it?s, and special deals that officials received only because of their political position.? Examples include the ?frivolous use of government airplanes, splendid offices, and bottomless expense accounts.? This conduct is considered excessive and resented by many, especially to those who are affected harshly by high unemployment and corporate downsizing. Patronage is a similar concept that works on the reward principal for job promotion. Loyalty to a particular political party, whether through monetary support or volunteer work, is often rewarded by offering a person positioned in the political sphear or by promoting the person. There are two main problems with patronage: 1) it is inconsistent with the ideal of political equality; 2) a create a relationship of dependence which influence political decisions. Canadian democracy and bureaucracy are built around the principles of the quality of opportunities and political representation. Patronage projects these principles by creating a realm of preferential treatment and representation of a politicians personal needs instead of the needs of the country.

As shown, various forces of conformity and exist in modern society?s the conflicting nature of these forces create difficulties in establishing when conformity is necessary what exactly conformity is. Forces of compliance, such as the class structure, group pressure, the idea of a social contract, achievement of societal and personal goals, the interdependent nature of society, and the fear of punishment create inequality in society and continue to into her overtime the strength of the sources of conformity ultimately produced negative ethical conduct, inequality, and disrupt the foundation of justice that the Canadian political system is based upon.

Conforming to Society's Norms 8.1 of 10 on the basis of 2527 Review.